Art of play was as substantial cultural accomplishment of human kind which was synchronous with growth of intellectual and rational of human had progress and evolution, there for, it is promlematic that history of its advent encircle to specific time and place limit.Some people put this art to prime forms of ancient Egytions, but what is defint that for first time, literature appears in ancient Greece.Script needs to elements which prove in out of mind, like each validity art and these elements include: story, protagonists, conversations, stoife or conflict.Conceptual play is kind of Script which Tofigh Hakim could rescue his mental works from obsenity of play.

Eastern Kufic Script, applied in copying of Qur`ans, was developed from early Kufic and was diversified between 4th to 7th /10th-13th centuries in East of the world of Islam. Despite significance of the Script in copying Qur`an, and also the large number of works remained with this Script, there are rare research on the different styles of it. This may be due to lack of information about the Script in the first hand resources or lack of colophon or any other information about the calligraphers and date of copying of many of the manuScripts. But for now a Qur`an held by Astan Quds Razawi that specifies date and place of production help us to cognition of a style of Eastern Kufic Script and paves the way for knowing about a regional style in Persian calligraphy. According to the colophon, the Qur`an copied in Isfahan in 327 AH/993 AD. The Qur`an was endowed by an anonymous person, named Kashwad ibn Amlas, likely in 5th/11th century. Similarity among the Script of the manuScript and some other Qur`an shows that the style was very common in the center of Iran probably through 4 and 5th/ 10-11th century. This article while introduces the Isfahan Qur`an and presenting a detailed survey on its Script, takes a look on 5 similar Qur`ans. The conclusion of the article shows that the main characteristics of Isfahan style of Eastern Kufic are: a style on the basis of cursive forms, tiny “ v” shaped and horizontal connections of the letters, short height of vertical letters (such as alif), and lack of oblong letters except at the end of the lines. Keywords: Isfahan, Eastern Kufic, Stylistics, Calligraphy, Kufic Script, Qur`a Eastern Kufic Script, applied in copying of Qur`ans, was developed from early Kufic and was diversified between 4 th to 7 th /10 th-13 th centuries in East of the world of Islam. Despite significance of the Script in copying Qur`an, and also the large number of works remained with this Script, there are rare research on the different styles of it. This may be due to lack of information about the Script in the first hand resources or lack of colophon or any other information about the calligraphers and date of copying of many of the manuScripts. But for now a Qur`an held by Astan Quds Razawi that specifies date and place of production help us to cognition of a style of Eastern Kufic Script and paves the way for knowing about a regional style in Persian calligraphy. According to the colophon, the Qur`an copied in Isfahan in 327 AH/993 AD. The Qur`an was endowed by an anonymous person, named Kashwad ibn Amlas, likely in 5 th/11 th century.

Christophe Luxenberg is the pseudonym of the author of the Siro-Arami reading of the Qur'an (The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran).Luxenberg claims that at the time of the emergence of the Qur'an, the Arabic language and Script did not possess a known nature. Basically, the Qur'an has been propagated in the Syriac language, Script and alphabet. Before him, Alphonse Mingana believed in the existence of a Syriac origin for the language and Script of the Qur'an. The Script, as a cultural phenomenon, has been studied from different aspects. In particular, extensive research has been done on the Arabic Script by writers and linguists as well as archaeologists. by relying on the studies of some scholars specially on Robert Hoyland about the background of the Arabic Script, this essay has reached to the conclusion that Luxenberg's views are merely propaganda claims against Islam and the Holy Quran and there are several archaeological evidences, including several inScriptions in Arabic language, criticizing Luxenberg's view.